I tried to initiate a DROS on a new gun purchase and brought my DMV registration and hole punched driver license with a paper interim license. The shop told me they could not accept it and I had to wait the few weeks until the new license arrived in the mail. I was told at the DMV and also on the phone that the hole punch basically disallows me to drive with it apart from the interim paper license and that the hole punched license is now just a picture ID.

When I got my P's (Provisional Driver Licence) they punched a hole in my L's (Learner Driver Licence) in a place where none of the information i.e. DOB is obscured. Your License Will No Longer be Punched The law no longer authorizes the police officer to mark your Washington state driver's license or permit to drive, by punching a hole in it. While this used to be the case, it is now unlawful for the police officer to mark, or destroy or invalidate your license in any manner.

Is a drivers license with a hole punch in it a valid ID? I have an expired license with a hole punched in it by the DMV to make it obvious that. If the DMV punches a hole in my license. Mike Murphy notes in a comment that the California DMV will let you keep an old driver's license, but will punch a hole in.

That's what I was told. *I brought my passport and they promptly told me to put it away as they could not accept it as a form of ID. Well, that is IF the DMV gets it right. I went for seven months with no license, due to their screw ups, and the fact that the local DMV office that processed my paperwork was closed for remodeling of the facility. After I was finally able to get a couple of paper extensions, I started using my then current CCW as a form of picture ID, even though it clearly stated on the card that it was not a valid form of ID. When my vehicle was totaled in a traffic collision (hit from behind), the nice traffic officer who happened upon the scene thought it was funny, and simply shook his head at the endless buffoonery that is the DMV. That you were denied DROS is just another example of what is wrong here.

Otherwise I'd have two driver's (driver driver's drivers') licenses. Short answer, no. If I had just left my driver license alone and changed only my registration, the shop said that they would have been fine (if only I knew).

Good luck, and I hope you get your license soon. Good grief, 7 months. You must break glasses or something like that to be unlucky lol. The only thing a dealer is allowed to accept per Penal Code Section 16400 is: (a) A valid California driver’s license; or (b) A valid California identification card.

If your identity is confirmed, you will be allowed to enter the screening checkpoint. You may be subject to additional screening. You will not be allowed to fly if your identity cannot be confirmed, you chose to not provide proper identification or you decline to cooperate with the identity verification process. TSA recommends you to arrive at least two hours in advance of your flight time to allow ample time for security screening and boarding the aircraft. They did this with me once, because I'm a dumbass - left my DL and tribal ID at my ma's house accidentally, and didn't have my passport on me.

So the piece of paper certified and printed by the DMV is good enough for the LAPD but not good enough for Ralph's? I'm still waiting for my new ID.

He glances, asks me if I wan't a copy of the DROS, I said, 'sure' and off I go. I guess it all depends who you get.

When my vehicle was totaled in a traffic collision (hit from behind), the nice traffic officer who happened upon the scene thought it was funny, and simply shook his head at the endless buffoonery that is the DMV. That you were denied DROS is just another example of what is wrong here. Good luck, and I hope you get your license soon.

I tried calling the DOJ with no answer and called the CA DMV who told me that I can use the license now as a picture ID. Anyone know where I can print out this distinction in CA law and perhaps persuade my shop to accept my current id or do I just need to wait (which is an incovenience but i'll live). I also would like to know for curiosity sake. The only thing I could find in the law so far was pertaining to my CA Notary law primer about which ID's I can accept; A.

Implied Consent — Test Refusal — Procedures (RCW 46.20.308) RCW 46.20.308 is the mechanism for not only DoL hearings, but also the admissibility of breath tests in the District and Municipal Courts. To obtain a hearing, however, it must be timely requested. The new deadline to request a hearing is one of the minor changes with a huge impact occurs. Paraphrased, subsection 7 now reads: A person receiving notification under subsection (6)(b) of this section may, within twenty days after the notice has been given, request in writing a formal hearing before the department.

My wallet is on the counter with CCW clearly visible and right next to my CDL which is out of the wallet along with the FSC and I just completed filling out all the paperwork and he asks me if I'm ready to perform the safe handling demonstration. I just smile and say, no, I'd like to wait and see if your boss is going to give the ok to the vehicle registrations and utility bills. So he goes over to check on the other clerk. Then comes back and says they're still discussing the utility bills and registration (I have no idea what the discussion entailed, but it seemed long for a yes / no decision). So he says, while we wait you can do the safe handling demonstration.

Request a Hearing The DoL must also serve you notice in writing your right to a hearing, specifying the steps he or she must take to obtain a hearing. This is typically achieved by the arresting officer giving you hearing request form and this is TIME SENSITIVE.

Free 8 ball pool game. If this is a driver's license you can go get an ID, interlock ignition license or replacement driver's license depending on your license status. If you have a valid license in Washington State (i.e.

The dealer cannot accept that as “clear evidence of the person’s identity and age.” thanks for the clarification. Strange how I can notarize any document with an expired / punched driver license but the doj can't. The name of the document is California Driver License, not driver's license (possessive), or drivers license (plural). Yes, it's a driver's Driver License, or a person's Driver License, or a resident's Driver License, but the name of the document is Driver License. Helps if you at least know the name of the document you're talking about, counselor. Actually, it might help you to know what you are talking about if you read the, which refers to: '(a) A valid California driver's license.

While this used to be the case, it is now unlawful for the police officer to mark, or destroy or invalidate your license in any manner. Despite Your arrest and being read warnings pre-breath testing about a possible suspension or revocation of Your license, Your license remains valid for a minimum of 60 days from the date of your arrest. As long as a hearing is properly requested, your license will remain valid until a hearing is actually held and you are subsequently notified of the hearing results by mail. The Hearing Proceedings Once the hearing is requested a date, time, hearing officer will be assigned. On the assigned date, the hearing officer will conduct the hearing, may issue subpoenas for the attendance of witnesses and the production of documents, and shall administer oaths to witnesses. The report of the law enforcement officer and any other evidence accompanying the report shall be admissible without any other showing required. You may, and SHOULD be represented by counsel, may question witnesses, may present evidence, and may testify.

You may be subject to additional screening. You will not be allowed to fly if your identity cannot be confirmed, you chose to not provide proper identification or you decline to cooperate with the identity verification process. TSA recommends you to arrive at least two hours in advance of your flight time to allow ample time for security screening and boarding the aircraft. They did this with me once, because I'm a dumbass - left my DL and tribal ID at my ma's house accidentally, and didn't have my passport on me. The head TSA dude pulled me aside and asked me a series of questions for about 15 minutes that (apparently) proved my identity, and then I was allowed to board the plane with my husband and kids, no problem. I know the TSA gets a mountain of shit talked about them, plenty of which is probably deserved, but - that guy was efficient and professional and did right by me.

Edit: last time I paid attention they state they won't issue a new ID for change of address. I was going to pull the 'I lost it' trick to update my address so I don't need the 2 forms of ID for long gun purchases but I just use my registration like I would for handguns. Saves me from putting 25 extra bucks straight into the corrupt CA government's pocket. The trick for next time is to just say you lost your license and need a replacement. AFAIK it costs the same and they won't hole punch your current license leaving you high and dry. Doesn't help much now, though.

Doesn't help much now, though. Edit: last time I paid attention they state they won't issue a new ID for change of address. I was going to pull the 'I lost it' trick to update my address so I don't need the 2 forms of ID for long gun purchases but I just use my registration like I would for handguns. Saves me from putting 25 extra bucks straight into the corrupt CA government's pocket. Sent from my C6740 using Tapatalk.

From the TSA site: In the event you arrive at the airport without valid identification, because it is lost or at home, you may still be allowed to fly. The TSA officer may ask you to complete a form to include your name and current address, and may ask additional questions to confirm your identity. If your identity is confirmed, you will be allowed to enter the screening checkpoint.

Ozya - you are in PA and the DL is from PA. These are rhetorical questions to think about. Ken's guidance is my experience - the hole is nothing to me, but what about the person's address? Application address same as DL's with the hole? Is the address 'current'? If from PA and the hole implies they got another state's DL - why?

The dealer cannot accept that as “clear evidence of the person’s identity and age.” Wouldn't a valid passport also suffice, despite the language in 16400? What is the corresponding statute that requires such clear evidence of a person's age and identity? I vaguely recall that evidence must reasonably show identity and age in another area of the code when it comes to DROS. Perhaps I am mistaken.